The UK's nuclear aspirations have been hindered by bureaucracy and expenses.

Labour has been advised to overhaul its nuclear regulations after an independent taskforce found that decades of complicated rules have hindered efficiency, increased costs, and diminished Britain's leadership in nuclear power.

Ministers are now confronted with 47 recommendations requiring a significant reset.

The review indicates that the existing system emphasizes processes over results. It claims the UK can construct nuclear facilities more quickly and affordably while maintaining robust safety standards by reducing redundancy and modernizing outdated regulations.

The taskforce advocates for a centralized system for nuclear approvals to reduce delays affecting recent projects and suggests aligning radiological standards with international norms.

It notes that the UK previously excelled in nuclear innovation until excessive bureaucracy hindered new initiatives and escalated costs.

Streamlining these regulations could save billions on decommissioning costs, stimulate growth, and decrease energy bills.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband supports the need for substantial reforms, stating the government is ushering in a new era of nuclear energy for energy sovereignty and abundance.

The taskforce calls for stronger political guidance and a coherent strategic plan encompassing both civil and defense initiatives. It recommends consolidating regulators, updating environmental and planning regulations, and eliminating unnecessary surveys that delay projects without enhancing safety.

Defense officials assert that quicker decisions are vital as the UK modernizes its nuclear deterrent and expands AUKUS submarine commitments. Ministers contend that unified nuclear governance will bolster skills, investment, and resilience.

Industry leaders express that the review highlights longstanding frustrations with a disjointed system that raises costs without improving results.

Tom Greatrex, chief of the Nuclear Industry Association, stated, "This report provides a unique opportunity to enhance nuclear regulation to be more coherent, transparent, and efficient."

He emphasized that while Britain's safety culture is strong, the surrounding processes have become fragmented and inconsistent, urging the government to implement the proposed reforms without delay.

Major developers believe the review should initiate a cultural shift in UK infrastructure delivery.

Sizewell C joint managing directors Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann remarked, "We support the report's focus on prioritizing outcomes and practicality over processes."

They assert that expedited approvals are crucial for achieving the long-term reactor program necessary for energy security, arguing that these changes can lower consumer costs and enhance environmental protections around sites.

The Chancellor will provide a formal response at the Budget, where she is anticipated to support key aspects of the proposal.

In conclusion, it is clear that the UK requires nuclear power on a large scale, and the existing system is inadequate to achieve this.